Re: [PLUG] Good wireless router(s)?

["Brent Saner" <brent.saner@gmail.com>]

sorry, i should clarify on what i say.

what i mean is that i feel the vanilla OpenWRT inferface is actually more user-friendly than X-wrt because Openwrt's interface follows the KISS standard better.
but if i personally HAD to use openwrt firmware as opposed to dd-wrt, i'd use the X-wrt.
X-wrt DOES look more "professional" and clean, but it can be pretty complex for the less-geek-inclined

On 10/30/07, Matthew Rosewarne < mrosewarne@inoutbox.com> wrote:

On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Brent Saner wrote:
> a lot of people use OpenWRT or the above Sveasoft.
> personally, i prefer DD-WRT (
> http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page), they seem a lot more
> "open" than Sveasoft and a bit more mature/better
> layout and feature-ful than open-wrt ( http://openwrt.org/ )

Is there any competition for the X-WRT webif^2 interface?  It's part of
OpenWRT and seems like the kind of thing that would make the open firmwares
approachable to mere mortals.

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --         http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

-- 
Brent Saner
215.264.0112
(cell)
215.362.7696(residence)

http://www.thenotebookarmy.org
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug