Kristian Erik Hermansen on 1 Feb 2008 03:25:57 -0800 |
On Feb 1, 2008 2:53 AM, Stephen Gran <steve@lobefin.net> wrote: > Can you show me benchmarks that demonstrate that all the time you spend > building your software is eventually repaid? e.g., if a build of the X > dependency chain takes 12 hours (which it used to, haven't done it in a > while), do you save so much time with your lean optimized binaries that > you will ever save 12 hours? And can you demonstrate this? Dude, I have been running Ubuntu since 2004. I ran Gentoo a long time ago (2001-2004, RH before that since 90's). You don't have to preach me on the "return of investment" spiel. What I was trying to get across is that Gentoo does have a legitimate purpose. In fact, a buddy of mine and I are planning to offer a service to millions of people which is built on top of Gentoo exactly because it is required. We have a system which required customized and fast executing binaries. The system doesn't change too often, and it is not graphical (this is a server), so we don't have to worry about 12 hour Gnome builds. The main advantage that Gentoo offers us is an established and tested framework for optimizing our binaries to perfection for production usage. I don't want to give too much away about what we plan to offer yet, but it requires that tools like ffmpeg and mencoder are optimized as much as possible :-) Just using standard i386 (or even plain amd64) binaries are a waste. We have powerful hardware and instruction sets on the hardware which is best utilized when software is built specifically to take advantage of it... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen "Know something about everything and everything about something." ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|