Bill Hance on 13 Feb 2008 06:13:56 -0800 |
When I took the RHCE exam it was $750. If you don't get the unbootable machine to boot in the morning, you fail, and can take the afternoon portion to gain experience, or you can go home at lunch time. There are classes that cost $3k+ that prepare you for the exam. At that price, you could take the test 4 times, which would prepare you for passing it on try #5 way better than any 4 day training class could. If you take a PC, load Fedora Core, update the packages to the latest Red Hat packages, and get services running (iptables, dns, dhcp, ftp, sendmail or procmail, etc...) and configured - that's the afternoon portion of the test. -Bill > I took the RHCE 300 class/exam, and it was just shy of $3K... that is 4 > days of fast track prep, followed by the exam. I believe the exam costs > about $700 alone. > > I took it in D.C., due to timing, but they have the course in King of > Prussia as well. I believe you can do just the exam at the same > location. > > > --Matt > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:49 -0500, Brian Vagnoni wrote: >> If you don't mind me asking how much was it to take the RH test(respond >> privately if you feel it's necessary)? Where you able to take it >> locally? >> >> Brian Vagnoni >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org >> [mailto:plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org] On Behalf Of Matt Mossholder >> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 8:36 AM >> To: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List >> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Linux Certification >> >> Having just taken both LPI 100 and RHCE, the RHCE is easier, if you have >> experience, because you can pass as long as you have an idea of how to >> do something... you don't need to know specifics on everything, since >> you have access to man pages, doc files, etc. >> >> Here's an example... I got an almost perfect score on the RHCE, but on >> LPI, I did much worse, because I always forget things like "what is the >> 3rd field of the crontab file". In the RHCE they are focused on results. >> For LPI, they focus on specific items of knowledge. >> >> I believe RHCE has the edge for exactly this reason. It is closer to >> reality, and demonstrates that you can do more than take a test. >> >> >> --Matt >> >> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 07:01 -0500, Brent Saner wrote: >> > RedHat still gets the most respect ATM, but there are a couple Ubuntu >> > certs out there (they're pretty new) and i can see them taking over >> > the reputation of RH in a couple years. >> > >> > On Jan 9, 2008 12:15 AM, Brian Vagnoni < bvagnoni@v-system.net> wrote: >> > Hi need some friendly peer advice. >> > >> > Which is the best route for Certification: >> > >> > Novell >> > >> > Redhat >> > >> > Linux+ >> > >> > Which of these can be self studied? How much does it cost to >> > take the test/s? >> > >> > What do people recommend. I would like to do Security related >> > stuff. But I feel Sysadmin is a good start, and or Cisco which >> > I know can be self studied. SANS is a lot of money not sure I >> > initially want to go that route. Masters in InfoSys would be >> > nice also a lot of money and time. >> > >> > Help appreciated. >> > >> > Thanks in advance >> > >> > Brian Vagnoni >> > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|