Casey Bralla on 24 Mar 2008 19:01:56 -0700 |
You're right. I was confusing Bytes with Bits. KDE reports the speed as MB/s, which I had assumed was bits. A quick calculation confirmed it is bytes. Now it makes sense. Thanks! On Monday 24 March 2008 12:58:29 pm Brian Stempin wrote: > Oh, one other thing: > > Are you being careful between M*Bits* and M*Bytes*? There's a pretty large > difference. A 100Mbit/sec connection = 12.5 MBytes/sec (remember: there > are 8 bits per byte). Once you count in TCP/IP overhead (usually between > 15% and 25%, depending on who you ask, jumbo frame settinsg, etc), > 9MBytes/sec is a fair throughput. I want to say that the fastest I've ever > gotten on a 100Mbit connection was around 10.2MBytes/sec. > > Anyways, all of that text to say, "Even if you had faster hard drives, your > network throughput wouldn't go up that much anyway, if at all." > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Brian Vagnoni <bvagnoni@v-system.net> > > wrote: > > From what I've read network speed auto negotiation is a real throughput > > killer. Interfaces should be manually set to 100mB full duplex if the > > card and switch can handle it. Also check for accessive broadcast traffic > > another throughput killer. > > > > Brian Vagnoni > > PGP Digital Fingerprint > > > > F076 6EEE 06E5 BEEF EBBD BD36 F29E 850D FC32 3955 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Casey Bralla <MailList@NerdWorld.org> > > Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 7:15 AM > > To: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List < > > plug@lists.phillylinux.org> > > Subject: [PLUG] Disk Transfer Speeds > > > > How fast are file transfers on your computer? > > > > Recently, I noticed that some of my networked servers seemed very slow. > > On large (100+ > > MByte) file transfers, I was getting rates less than 1 MBit/sec. > > Changing out an old > > 10 MBit/sec hub to a 100 MBit/sec switch increased the speed to about 8-9 > > MBits/sec. > > A little more investigation revealed that *local* transfers (on the same > > disk) maxed > > out at about 9 MBits/sec. This seems to point to a limitation on the > > disk itself. > > > > This still seems slow to me. > > > > I've got a fairly good computer: AMD 3400+, 2 GBytes of RAM, Gentoo, > > KDE, ReiserFS, > > Disk DMA active, with a half-dozen programs running. > > > > > > I'm curious what speeds other people get with large files. (Gotta be > > sure that the > > file is bigger than the cache to keep from getting bogus numbers) > > > > -- > > > > > > Casey Bralla > > Chief Nerd in Residence > > The NerdWorld Organisation > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > >__ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- > > http://www.phillylinux.org > > Announcements - > > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > > General Discussion -- > > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > >__ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- > > http://www.phillylinux.org > > Announcements - > > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > > General Discussion -- > > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug -- Casey Bralla Chief Nerd in Residence The NerdWorld Organisation ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|