| brent timothy saner on 13 Sep 2008 18:37:22 -0700 |
|
Brian Vagnoni wrote: > However and in the spirit of discussion; who cares if someone wants to have bouncing balls on their desktop during idle. I know I don't. As long as screen saver is appropriate for the situation, more power to you. "more /power/ to you" is a pun, i hope? > If a ******trusted****** screen saver performs any useful function at all it provides a *********very small ****** level of desktop privacy. Which is ********slightly******* enhanced when it includes password protection. care to provide a case-scenario for us to demonstrate how it doesn't add a beneficial amount of security? granted, it's no end-all be-all, but i'd be interested in hearing about known flaws/weaknesses in it. > I hope this ends this discussion as I don't know if my mailbox can take it. :-) then why are you fueling the fire? :P really, though, all this text can't possibly put THAT much strain on your mta... -- brent saner. gpg info at http://www.notebookarmy.org/gpg.txt (this is a shorter sig.) grep -i hotchicks * Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|