JP Vossen on 23 May 2009 12:18:24 -0700 |
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:34:35 -0400 > From: LeRoy <ldc@lrcressy.com> > > That is why it is always best to have a live CD and physical access > to the machine. I have to go with David and disagree with "best." It may be nice, but it isn't always possible, or at least feasible. In my particular case it would be inconvenient but possible. The examples I'm thinking of are research setups as have come up on Slashdot and TheDailyWTF recently, where machines are hundreds of miles away in a shack, or perhaps totally inaccessible during parts of the year. Of course there are other tricks like offline recovery partitions, ideally on another device (like a CFcard), serial consoles, and so forth. Not necessarily perfect or non-trivial, but... Later, JP ----------------------------|:::======|------------------------------- JP Vossen, CISSP |:::======| http://bashcookbook.com/ My Account, My Opinions |=========| http://www.jpsdomain.org/ ----------------------------|=========|------------------------------- "Microsoft Tax" = the additional hardware & yearly fees for the add-on software required to protect Windows from its own poorly designed and implemented self, while the overhead incidentally flattens Moore's Law. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|