Aaron Mulder on 3 Jul 2009 15:47:15 -0700 |
I get more battery life than a fair number of non-Mac people around me, and I have one of the models with a removable battery. If you offer me the chance to have a substantial increase in battery life AND a battery that doesn't wear out as fast, just what exactly is the down side? And how can it be a money grab by Apple if it means 1) nobody buys an extra battery and 2) people don't need to buy replacement batteries as often? Still, I'll keep my liver, thanks. Thanks, Aaron On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Brian Vagnoni<bvagnoni@v-system.net> wrote: > So what are folks feelings on the new Macbook and the non-removable battery? > > Congratulations to Apple for helping protect the environment. I want to give Steve Jobs a piece of my liver. > > Or > > Apple is so evil for trying to get another buck out of its users. > > I personally feel that laptops typically outlast their batteries, so therefore it feels like another money grab by Apple. Regardless my next laptop will most likely be a Macbook. The multi-os option is just too tempting. > > Brian Vagnoni > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|