Rich Freeman on 22 Sep 2011 15:58:05 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Windows 8 secure boot would 'exclude' Linux |
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:47 PM, <tomdf@verizon.net> wrote: > Typical microsoft: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/21/secure_boot_firmware_linux_exclusion_fears/ I have mixed feelings about this. Secure boot is actually a good thing - as long as it is secured FOR me and not FROM me. As long as I can control the keys in my BIOS I'm fine with it. What I don't want is a system that only boots an OS if the vendor certifies it. People who buy hardware should be able to install the software of their choosing on it, and they should be able to replace public keys embedded in the firmware to support this. Otherwise secure boot is fine - with the right software this can result in a linux install that can't be easily tampered with. Rich ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug