brent timothy saner on 21 Feb 2014 13:07:34 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Signing contracts digitally? |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/21/2014 03:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:35 PM, brent timothy saner > <brent.saner@gmail.com> wrote: >> However, what is the status of this in the US? Are digital >> signatures (e.g. done via PGP/openPGP[GnuPG/GPG]) considered >> valid and legally binding? > > I'm not an expert on e-sig law in general, but I do deal with > e-sigs insofar as they are regulated by the US FDA. > Rich- Thanks, this was fairly informative. Do you happen to have any contacts you can send me off-list that would perhaps have legal experience with this? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTB8APAAoJEIwATC+TSB9roaQQAMz/3pnnk+X4DFGVj1rZGaaY vEjHSwb2gogcFRJgPlkcWIUq8nuIrftZUcXhxLIgU3AACKmwMvyd+teytssADCoX n6tvdotnskzgF0Ij3/JzdP9FS4UpxwZB4QlCas65afFcCfvcjdz8GjqKL3k1doAO 8Xp9b/Uf3YBhEqxCL98PudJjdh6Zj0HlCmly8o1itCnNzFh7JWVXkWWDpDTjoJsx pibPrWU5oqhA2fYO9elPqRbleWIGaY6p+kunEsYcp2SERzmqqtw3NlNSEoh0FEJ0 4FY++Q0Gg5X9yc/5hD21cS/xswi0TWAFkFg1FEn7L+1+5G6w64Yp3z5BG7zYpMHE 93sVq+DrCh2Nj3JsJ9o/YV1QKrPkqXgTvfhVsU7ZDVlxWp5BjeIF58iufsruiU5e x/kIk/Rni+i4DdqoHHBhkEqMJ6Jf+PIcxjTAX3b6MEjXOIV4SKiQdr94Y23hfmgT XuT6NANiofrrs13FIPM8Xxty7YiOJUqyWmN4xhJpp852ymPOWHMyv3CEtne52lle 1eQGf0zY/WIIvnI9kjM6n90AEJ2ZsvoctKgLhS20XBKjZ94CTT+joM/ZluNKwimW fKE7Mpxqaheu+rXURZ3fN0W/QDrmUVgSPsW5oOKl8+NilLkRaJE/JNZZW1392hlj EAI+2MNc8++C6LCH0HW4 =DCIl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug