brent timothy saner on 21 Feb 2014 13:07:34 -0800


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Signing contracts digitally?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/21/2014 03:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:35 PM, brent timothy saner 
> <brent.saner@gmail.com> wrote:
>> However, what is the status of this in the US? Are digital
>> signatures (e.g. done via PGP/openPGP[GnuPG/GPG]) considered
>> valid and legally binding?
> 
> I'm not an expert on e-sig law in general, but I do deal with
> e-sigs insofar as they are regulated by the US FDA.
> 

Rich-

Thanks, this was fairly informative. Do you happen to have any
contacts you can send me off-list that would perhaps have legal
experience with this?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=DCIl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug