Re: [PLUG] "find" command troubles

[JP Vossen <jp@jpsdomain.org>]

On 04/15/2014 02:52 PM, brent timothy saner wrote:
[...]
> You can leave off the "-exec ls" part if you just want a list. :)
> (you can also do -exec ls -l '{}' \; to repeat your two steps into one)
[...]
> find /mnt/backup/ -type f -mtime "+3" [-exec ls -l '{}' \;]
>
> The stuff in [] is optional, of course. (leave out the [] if you
> actually want to include it)
Depending on your goal you may want to avoid using -exec if you can, 
since IIRC it will basically spawn a sub-shell per iteration.  That can 
quickly become a lot of overhead if you 'find' a lot of files.  OTOH, 
that can also be exactly what you need if you need to process them one 
at a time or something.  YMMV.
If all you want is 'ls -l' sort of output, look at the find "-ls" 
option, which is not the same format, but...  If you require either 'ls 
-l' or some other specific format, look at 'find ... -printf' and build 
your own.  Like:
# "CCYY-MM-DD HH:MM {tab} size {tab} path" sorted by path:
find . -type f -printf '%TY-%Tm-%Td %TH:%TM\t%s\t%p\n' \
 | sort -t'	' -k3,3

Later,
JP
----------------------------|:::======|-------------------------------
JP Vossen, CISSP            |:::======|      http://bashcookbook.com/
My Account, My Opinions     |=========|      http://www.jpsdomain.org/
----------------------------|=========|-------------------------------
"Microsoft Tax" = the additional hardware & yearly fees for the add-on
software required to protect Windows from its own poorly designed and
implemented self, while the overhead incidentally flattens Moore's Law.
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug