Re: [PLUG] swappiness and ssd

["Keith C. Perry" <kperry@daotechnologies.com>]

Ahh so swappiness=0 is not a weird setting.

---
KP-

On Jul 10, 2015 9:05 PM, "Rich Mingin (PLUG)" <plug@frags.us> wrote:
>
> I was declining to post, but I'll just chime in, I'm also swappiness=0 on my machines. The two that touch VMs have 32GB of ram, SSDs, and a small swap file on some spinning rust, so I get all of the benefits listed, without unneeded SSD wear.
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Rich Freeman <r-plug@thefreemanclan.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Keith C. Perry
>> <kperry@daotechnologies.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Rich Freeman, you and I both leave off for similar reasons.  Did you know
>> > about this?  Looks like a lower setting (like 0  LOL) might get swap to
>> > perform in a "sane" way.
>> >
>>
>> I've never really been satisfied with it, even with a swappiness of 0.
>>
>> --
>> Rich
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
>> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
>> General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug