Martin Cracauer via plug on 16 Dec 2021 15:33:45 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Growing a RAID 5 (sorry about the missend) |
Can you post /dev/mdstat please? Just to clarify what you are trying to do here: - you have a degraded but online 2-disk raid5 of net 1 TB - you want to add 1 drive to make it a non-degraded net 1 TB - then you want to add another drive to make it net 2 TB ? Martin Adam Zion via plug wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:43:27PM -0500: > Let's try that again... > > I had a 1 TB RAID 5 consisting of 2 1TB drives (yes, that works). To double > its capacity, I purchased two more 1TB drives. They were mounted as /dev/sdc > and /dev/sdd, and I created an ext4 partition on each so that I had /dev/sdc1 > and /dev/sdd1. > > Then, I needed to issue commands to grow the RAID. I did as follows: > > sudo --grow --raid-devices=4 /dev/md0 > and > sudo mdadm --grow --raid-devices=4 /dev/md0 > > I had expected that the second command would take a LONG time to complete. > But, it seemed to finish in <1 min. Now, sudo mdadm --detail /dev/md0 > yields the following: > > /dev/md0: > Version : 1.2 > Creation Time : Thu Dec 9 23:50:04 2021 > Raid Level : raid5 > Array Size : 976627712 (931.38 GiB 1000.07 GB) > Used Dev Size : 976627712 (931.38 GiB 1000.07 GB) > Raid Devices : 4 > Total Devices : 4 > Persistence : Superblock is persistent > > Intent Bitmap : Internal > > Update Time : Thu Dec 16 22:40:07 2021 > State : clean, reshaping > Active Devices : 4 > Working Devices : 4 > Failed Devices : 0 > Spare Devices : 0 > > Layout : left-symmetric > Chunk Size : 512K > > Consistency Policy : bitmap > > Reshape Status : 0% complete > Delta Devices : 2, (2->4) > > Name : home-nas:0 (local to host home-nas) > UUID : 41dcee9c:5feb3a19:d1d7ce0e:905f749d > Events : 12742 > > Number Major Minor RaidDevice State > 0 8 17 0 active sync /dev/sdb1 > 2 8 1 1 active sync /dev/sda1 > 4 8 49 2 active sync /dev/sdd1 > 3 8 33 3 active sync /dev/sdc1 > > Obviously, from the array size at the top, this has not completed adding > the new drives to the RAID. But, at the bottom, mdadm clearly shows that it > *has* done so. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Adam+Zion, MSIS > Registered Linux User #471910 > http://www.adamzion.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/azion1995> > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug