|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Linux vs. PC-BSD as a desktop OS?
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greg Helledy wrote:
> I've been using linux as a desktop OS since 2002, Debian stable since
> Woody. Periodically, I read things about how great the BSDs are.
> PC-BSD seems to be a "distro" of FreeBSD, aimed at filling the desktop
> role. The reviews tend to focus on the iffy ease-of-use of KDE4, rather
> than the overall usability and maintainability of the system (I'm a KDE3
> user so I guess I'll face this sooner or later anyway).
>
> Has anyone used PC-BSD or FreeBSD as a desktop? Any major pluses or
> minuses vs. Debian? This isn't really linux so maybe it's better kept
> off-list. Thanks,
> Greg
>
>
>
well, PC-BSD is a "distro" of *BSD. FreeBSD is also a "distro" of *BSD.
they're not meant to be hierarchical, they're meant to be forks.
that being said, PC-bsd has shady hardware support but it's a lot easier
install/setup/ freebsd has a wider supported hardware base and is one of
the best maintained *bsd's, but it's a bit tricky if you're new to bsd.
personally, i prefer openbsd but that's because i tend to only use bsd
on servers or network appliances (routers, firewalls, etc.).
bsd is still lacking pretty far behind in the desktop area, in my opinion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkphEIcACgkQ8u2Zh4MtlQpEswCgvu9vP9Aiu8WrKwx/tuq9vdUZ
l0gAoMrV/xDsLmQumnyHwvXnBcmPLEBq
=Ux20
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|