|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: Emacs, was Re: YAPAS (Yet Another Python Advocacy Story) (fwd)
|
I don't really think that that's a fair measure. The higher up features
that rarely get used are exclusively Lisp while a lot more of the lower
level stuff is C.
Besides, emacs is still not Word. I'd like to see somebody do a word like
program in a scripted language (hehe, here's where I invite people to
contradict me).
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Adam Turoff wrote:
> Forwarded message:
> > Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 21:09:30 -0500 (EST)
> > From: rspier@seas.upenn.edu (Robert Spier)
> > To: phl@lists.pm.org
> > Subject: Emacs, was Re: YAPAS (Yet Another Python Advocacy Story)
> >
> > >>>>> "NR" == Nicolai Rosen <nick@netaxs.com> writes:
> > NR> In context he was implying a Word type word processor. Are you
> > NR> talking about emacs? I thought it was written in C w/ a lot of
> > NR> configuration and scripts and whatnot done in Lisp?
> >
> > Emacs is essentially a lisp interpreter. Some of the high-frequency
> > functions and basic buffer manipulation is done in C.
> >
> > C and Header
> > 258965 lines 7484242 bytes
> >
> > Lisp
> > 490238 lines 17970670 bytes
> >
> > Thats from the root directory of GNU emacs-20.6
> >
> > A little eyeballing, and 2/3 of emacs (by line) is LISP. It's even
> > more by bytes.
> >
> > $emacs++;
> >
> > -R
> >
> >
>
> **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>**
> **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
>
Nicolai Rosen
nick@netaxs.com
Earthstation/Netaxs
**Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>**
**To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|