Re: NT4.0 way faster than Linux 2.2.2 ???

[Adam Moore <daq102@yahoo.com>]

I totally agree. I've seen Windoze NT and Windoze98/95
webservers and they suck. The performance is terrible
and then you have the "screen of death" factor. I'm
setting up a RH/Apache webserver box, and it does
smoke. About the M$ paying, what less would you
expect?

--- "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@njcc.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Roger C. Scudder Jr. wrote:
> > Here's an interesting study.  This study finds
> NT4.0 server 
> > 2.5 times faster than Linux as a file server and
> 3.7 times faster 
> > as a web server...
> >
>
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html
> 
> 
> Your a little behind on the news.
> The study was paid for by Mickeysoft, the NT machine
> was optimized and
> Linux was not, etc, etc, etc...
> 
> Even Mickeysoft has come out a said the test was
> messed up.
> 
> This issue has bounced around on most of the lists
> and on Slashdot, check
> slashdot archives for the stories.
> 
> I use NT on a P233 at work, and Linux on a P90 at
> home, trust me NT is not
> faster.  My P90 smokes the P233.
> 
> Oracle just did some tests (I don't have the URL)
> and showed the exact
> reverse results.  That Linux was faster by far.
> 
> -- 
> 
> David L. Martin        <dlmarti@njcc.com>
> R&D Software Engineer 
> http://pluto.njcc.com/~dlmarti
> PGP: 16 C0 C0 AB 4E A2 2C 89  FF 8B 07 CF C0 72 3D
> 89
> 
> To err is human, to moo bovine.
>  
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with the word
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject
> or body of your message to
> plug-request@lists.nothinbut.net
> 
> 

===
Adam Moore
Daq102@yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with the word 'unsubscribe' in the subject
or body of your message to plug-request@lists.nothinbut.net