|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [Plug] Trouble starting X remotely
|
The device would have to be sophisticated enough to handle ssh or something
like it, or everyone with a radio could sniff your traffic.
could you use rf (or whatever HAM radio ops use?) to tranismit the data?
k
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"From a certain point onward there is no longer any turning back. That is the
point that must be reached."
-- Kafka
mortis@voicenet.com http://www.voicenet.com/~mortis
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Nick R wrote:
> Yeah, the only problem I can think of is the expense of the connection & the
> number of people who would find this usefull enough to buy it. The actual
> device could be just a screen, modem/cell phone, some sort of primitive
> video card type of dealie, & a jack for a one handed keyboard. You could
> make something like that for a few hundred at most.
>
>
> >From: "Daniel W. Ottey" <udottey@mcs.drexel.edu>
> >Reply-To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> >To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> >Subject: Re: [Plug] Trouble starting X remotely
> >Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> >Interesting... You mena like a portable "dumb terminal" ? I guess if it
> >had a cellular/satelite modem, that would be pretty cool. The actual
> >machine probably wouldn't be too expensive. Would probably be even
> >cheaper than a 386 laptop. Somehow you would have to get it Internet
> >access, but it wouldn't need to be VERY fast, since its only relaying
> >text. Thats an interesting idea. I like it! (I could telnet into my box
> >from anywhere I was and check my email... whoo!)
> >
> >Daniel W. Ottey
> >Sophomore Computer Science Student
> >Drexel University - Philadelphia, PA
> >http://www.snarfykat.org/
> >AOL Instant Messenger: Snarf2002 - http://www.aim.aol.com/
> >ICQ: 5723666 - http://www.mirabilis.com/
> >IRC: ThundrKat - http://www.undernet.org/
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Nick R wrote:
> >
> > > You know what I've always thought somebody should make (and by always, I
> > > mean for the past few months or less)? I think it would be cool to have
> >a
> > > little portable telnet client. Just something simple w/ a fairly small
> > > screen that could do telnet logins. It would be better than a PDA. The
> > > problem is that the connection could be expensive and the density of
> >people
> > > who would have Unix boxes to connect to would only be great enough in
> > > Silicon Valley, but it's a cool idea I think.
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Joshua Mazess <mazessj@op.net>
> > > >Reply-To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> > > >To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> > > >Subject: Re: [Plug] Trouble starting X remotely
> > > >Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 08:32:41 -0400
> > > >
> > > >Most telnet clients display text only, no graphics. They are too "thin"
> >to
> > > >do
> > > >anything more complicated than that. Some do ReGIS, but I doubt that
> >can
> > > >handle
> > > >high resolution and many colors. You need an X server for any system
> >that
> > > >you
> > > >want to act as an I/O terminal. So, you would need an X server for
> >Win95
> > > >and
> > > >then you could run your X clients from Linux and direct I/O to the
> >Win95
> > > >box by
> > > >setting the DISPLAY environment variable (or by specifying on the
> >command
> > > >line
> > > >of the X client). --Josh
> > > >
> > > >Michael Leone wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have a machine running Slackware 3.4 (kernel 2.0.34) as an
> >intranet
> > > >web
> > > > > server, email server, etc, on my LAN - all the good stuff that Linux
> > > >does
> > > > > so well and silently. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway - I have X installed on this server. If I startx from the
> >server
> > > > > console, everything comes up just as it should. Life is good.
> > > > >
> > > > > If I telnet in (from a Win95 station), and (following the example in
> >_A
> > > > > Practical Guide to Linux_, the only book I have handy here at work)
> >do a
> > > > > echo $DISPLAY (to get the contents of the DISPLAY environmental
> >variable
> > > >to
> > > > > pass to X), I get a blank - not the ":0.0" example in the book.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, when I startx from the telnet session, X starts over on the
> >server
> > > > > console.
> > > > > And I have to go over to the server and stop X. Life is bad.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. What am I doing wrong? I want the X to show in my telnet window
> >on my
> > > > > workstation, not on the server. How can I pass X the info to show up
> > > >here
> > > > > rather than there?
> > > > > 2. Does the server have to already be running X?
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > "...and if you have any questions about anything, come on up and ask
> > > > > me. Even if I don't know the answer, I'll make something up and
> >you'll
> > > > > believe me."-Unknown
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> > > http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
> > >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> >http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
>
_______________________________________________
Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|