Re: [Plug] Routing problems - worse, I think

[Tracy Nelson <tnelson@fast.net>]

I have the same set-up as you, and mine works just fine.  The only
difference I can see is that you have an extra entry for 192.168.0.0 --
remove the one that has your machine as the gateway and see if that
works.  My routing table looks like this:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
192.168.0.3     *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0
eth0
209.92.5.3      *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0
ppp0
192.168.0.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
eth0
127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0
lo
default         209.92.5.3      0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
ppp0
(My machine is 192.168.0.3)

I'm running on a network with a couple of NT servers (one of which
handles the DNS tasks) and an NT workstation and a Win98 box.  I can
telnet into my Linux box just fine (except there's a long delay when
establishing the connection, I probably don't have everything configured
right yet).

Michael Leone wrote:
> 
> I tried to fix my route problems, and I think I just made it worse.
> Here's the route table now:
> 
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 192.168.0.1     *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0
> eth0
> 207.8.165.190   *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0
> ppp0
> 192.168.0.0     192.168.0.1     255.255.255.0   UG    0      0        0
> eth0
> 192.168.0.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0
> lo
> default         207.8.165.190   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
> ppp0
> 
> My local (LAN) IP = 192.168.0.1
> The 207.8.165.190 is my ISP's router, which *should* be the gateway for
> the ppp0 interface, altho he tells me the line should read "0.0.0.0" as
> the destination. Also - I'm told - 192.168.0.1 should have a gateway of
> 0.0.0.0.
> 
> I can connect to the internet just fine this way. Can't seem to
> telnet/ftp in from another station on my local LAN, tho, which I also
> need to do. I've tried all kinds of combinations of "route del", to no
> good effect (obviously).
> 
> Can anybody lend a hand? Using RedHat 6.0.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug

_______________________________________________
Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug