|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
If they waited this long, then they havent exactly been spending time
protecting their intellectual property. I doubt this will really stand
on its own if it were to go to court. There's too much of a precedent
set by people who've been using gif's on the www for YEARS and they
havent made a move. This sounds more like a shakedown than a company
out to protect itself.
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, I never even played one on TV. Dont take
my word as anything other than paranoid, sleep deprived ranting.
J.
When I grow up, I wanna be more like me.
I had a clue. I didn't like it. I took it back and exchanged it for an
attitude.
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, elek wrote:
> As much as I'd like to "burn all GIFs" - I'm going crazy here.
>
> As a web designer - I've got a gazillion GIFs on sites all over the place.
> I used GIFs since not all browsers can read jpg's or png's.
>
> So now - I have all these GIFs on web sites and no time to get them all
> switched.
>
> I wonder if this is why they held out so long before saying "okay now we
> want our money"...
>
> I knew they pretty much "owned" the format but I thought the vendor of the
> image software needed the license (I'm not exactly brilliant when it comes
> to copyright/trademark/patent laws and I'm still not quite sure I
> understand which vendor licenses are and are not acceptable).
>
> -elek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
>
_______________________________________________
Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|