|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
root wrote:
>
> Hey Michael et. al.,
> I too have taken M$ certifications, and IMNSHO, they are niether as simplistic
> as Nick's description, nor are they even vaguely comprehensive as you seem to
> stipulate.
> I don't want to drag this thread into a long debate on the validity of m$
> certs., but I will reiterate. Certifications *should* be to determine the best
> of the best, not what they are now.
Hmmm, not sure I agree with this. Certification should prove that the
person posessing the certificate knows the subject covered under the
certification. It's not a watershed, separating the top N percent.
Personally, I'd like to see gradients within certificates. I.e., a "red
level" certificate means that the holder scored in the top 2 percent,
with a "blue level" indicating that the person had scored in the top
five percent, etc. Kind of like a GPA.
Q: What do they call someone who graduates at the bottom of their class
in med school?
A: Doctor.
Just junk food for thought...
_______________________________________________
Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|