|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 12:08:14PM -0500, Andrew Brennan wrote:
> Is the 64Mb limit a kernel issue? I have a box that has 96Mb and it's not
> finding it, but another with 128Mb and no problems (same kernels) and I've
> always thought it was a BIOS issue. I'll admit I never did the homework -
> just assumed this based on the hardware. Both are 2.0 kernels.
>
> andrew.
My present kernel is 2.2 and I had to add the memory line in for the
earlier installation and the present lilo.conf doesn't have it -- I
have 96 MB of ram.
>
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Michael W. Ryan wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 10:36:21AM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote:
> > > > > I've got 128 MB in my box. Linux recognizes it all and I never added
> > > > > anything to lilo.conf.
> > >
> > > 2.2.14.
> >
> > I'm still on the 2.0 series.
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net
> Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
--
Rebecca Ore
http://www.ogoense.net
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|