|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Reply-to issue with the mailing list.
|
> > Um... could we maybe put a stop to the public AOLs?
> This is not a particularly easy problem to resolve. It's a big user
> education issue...mailings are set so that both "reply" and "reply
> all" go to the entire list
> But the end-user support side-effect remains. It is the unintended
> consequence of having the "Reply-to" point only back to the list:
> In order to reply to the individual sender instead of the entire list
> requires additional thought and effort -- one must manually address, or
> otherwise edit the outgoing message headers.
I don't know, I use pine, and when I go to reply to a message it goes
through the following steps of questions it asks me:
first it asks me if I want to include the original message in the reply,
then it asks me "Use 'Reply-to:' instead of 'From:' address?"
then it asks me "Reply to all recipients?"
I just want to know one thing. What is an "AOLs"? did you mean ALSO? as
in ME-TOO? or is this just some term I do not know?
--
msimons@slackware.com INFORMATION*MEDIA*PHOTOGRAPHY msimonsmail@yahoo.com
Creative Arts Resource Project : PTMaterials Exchange : www.pleasetake.org
A 501(c)3 Non-profit Organization Arts and Environmental Resource Network
Shopping Online? Use http://www.igive.com/carp/ make donations at no cost!
Do you like what I do? Consider donating resources to CARP; Ask me how!
_________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|