|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] ifile and spam
|
"Arthur S. Alexion" <arthur@alexion.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 13:56, news@kippona.com wrote:
>> I'm having good luck with ifile, one of the bayesian filters,
>> with spam. My standard is spamassassin with spamass-milter, and
>> ifile seems more effective and faster.
>>
>> Here's a link to a recent conference:
>>
>> http://spanconference.org/
Oops:
http://spamconference.org/
> How does it compare to bogofilter (if you've tried that too)?
I haven't tried bogofilter, but it seems great. EMR mentioned in
his presentation at the conference that the training set is more
important than the algorithm for determining performance.
Chris
_________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|