|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] BCCs potentially exposed
|
I've BCC'd this to a third party to see how mutt handles it <grin>.
Eric
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:11:44PM -0400, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> I just learned on the Evolution list that some servers add the header
> Apparently-to: identifying BCC recipients.
>
> In Windows, I have always used Pegasus as my MUA. Pegasus sends out
> separate mails whenever there is a BCC, to insure security. I thought
> all MUAs did this.
>
> Are the other Linux MUAs broken like Evolution? Is it a flaw in the
> standard that permits this?
>
> In my work BCCs and their privacy are critical. It's a "don't use this
> software for serious work" issue.
> --
> Arthur S. Alexion <arthur@alexion.com>
> Arthur S. Alexion LLC
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Eric Lucas
========================================================================
Property rights are not the rights of property; they are the rights of
HUMANS with regard to property. They are a particular kind of human
right.
-- David Friedman
_________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|