Re: [PLUG] how about PLUG singles?

[MITCHELL MALTENPORT <mmalten@comcast.net>]

Thank you, I'd forgotten!

Mitch Maltenfort

GE/MD d+ s: a C UL P+ L+++ E W+ N+ o-- K- w$(---) M+ PS+ PE Y PGP- t 5+ 
X-- R* tv+ b++ >b+++ DI++++ D--- G- e++++ h+ r* y+ 

Isn't this what geekcode is for?

    http://www.geekcode.com/

-Jeff


On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:03:27PM -0400, Paul wrote:
>   [23 lines, 117 words, 846 characters]  Top characters: _etniosa
> 
> I think you just out did me!  8^)  PLUG singles?
> 
> If my messages are /that/ bad, please, feel free to flame me and maybe 
> I'll correct my ways.
> 
> 
> MITCHELL MALTENPORT wrote:
> 
> >Now that Paul below has set a precedent for "email with questionable 
> >value" -- his phrase, not mine -- I'm going to put up my lightning rod -
> >- or should that be heat sink?
> >
> >If we're talking about useful sub-groups of PLUG, how about singles?  
> >
> >No, I ain't putting my foot in my mouth with this one.  Putting my 
> >tongue in my cheek doesn't leave enough room!