RE: Maybe it's time for a FAQ? (was Re: [PLUG] I don't get it. What's the big deal with putting the response on top?)

["Howard Bloom" <lists@pc-man.com>]

I never stated which way I would post - bottom or top.  Nor did I say I was
inflexible.  

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org 
> [mailto:plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org] On Behalf Of Paul
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 1:46 AM
> To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org
> Subject: Re: Maybe it's time for a FAQ? (was Re: [PLUG] I 
> don't get it. What's the big deal with putting the response on top?)
> 
> Howard Bloom wrote:
> 
> >That is a technical problem and not something that I am 
> afflicted with.  
> >I use Outlook.  It does a wonderful job of presenting me with the 
> >information in the format that I want.
> >
> >  
> >
> Consider this: Bamboo sways in the wind, but it always grows 
> straight.  
> What I'm trying to say is, why not demonstrate some 
> flexibility, both your own and that of Outlook, and follow 
> the lead of this list instead of taking part in needless 
> skirmishes?  Or at least respond to bottom-quoted messages 
> with bottom-quoting, and respond to top-quoted messages with 
> top-quoting.  This is the approach that I usually take.

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug