|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Re: DSL she no go...
|
Craig at DCA said to get the one IP working and then they would assign
more if I requested it. It would be easier to have the /29 routed to the
main, MAC/DHCP address though. One step at a time.
For now I am routing it (DSL modem) to a Linksys gateway/router. This
ultimately may not be the best choice though. I don't think I can route
IP's on the LAN side other then the 192.168 stuff but I am still learning
what it can do.
What I would really like to do is let the Linksys firewall my 192.168
network where I have WinX machines, printers, net tune receiver, etc. and
also have a couple of ports with real IP's to Linux boxes. One would be a
server and the other for play - mainly amateur radio stuff. Another choice
would be to port forward the stuff to the appropriate behind the FW
device. It also has a DMZ channel which could be the server with it's own
FW.
Doug
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Eric Hidle wrote:
>
> Just curious why you are still going to get the bridged IP addresses
> instead of the /29 block? With the routed block you only need to give
> them the MAC address of your router's external interface.. you'll get 1
> static/dhcp IP for your router's external interface, and a subnet
> allocation for your internal LAN. It is supposed to be included in the
> package but I guess it's one of those things you have to ask for.
> E
>
****************************
* Doug Crompton *
* Richboro, PA 18954 *
* 215-431-6307 *
* *
* doug@crompton.com *
* wa3dsp@wa3dsp.ampr.org *
* http://www.crompton.com *
****************************
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|