|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] OT: Mac OS X question
|
- From: zuzu <sean.zuzu@gmail.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] OT: Mac OS X question
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:10:50 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=GAhWfZp/Owmj2gCh7XEusG8T5lVZEUsbnDbacnQRA0M=; b=e8N9M5zIgb72h2ttG9TCab2XYp+fZLQ6jx2W9y0fjFAsYSs4LfaCpRN4W98A9fc0uNeDkZfnMq8EKTfc452p9IEJkBsH2tTFOaYrThzQSIlkoAluYdcTQmh9lljXiJ/YdSAudLS67fRLJ8lyGnP02TrwBhBgzE1WOOZpwEcRkuw=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
On 10/10/07, Jason <jcostom@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/07, zuzu <sean.zuzu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Second, while 1 GB is sluggish on a 2 GHz Intel Core Duo MacBook
> > > Pro, 2 GB is quite sufficient to run Firefox with 20+ tabs,
> >
> > try Firefox -- especially Firefox rather than Camino -- with 200+ tabs,
>
> Wow, put the rulers away guys.. Come on now, who really opens over
> 200 pages at the same time?
myself right now:
[169 tabs] Gmail - [PLUG] OT: Mac OS X question
> (queue the chorus of people shouting
> about how this is their daily routine...) 200 tabs is most certainly
> out of the ordinary. Either you're doing something tragically wrong,
> or you work very differently from the vast majority of us. Either
> way, you'll need to come to grips with the fact that having 200 open
> tabs in any browser is not normal.
I wonder how we could get empirical evidence on this. something like
SLife, perhaps?
http://www.slifelabs.com/
for those of you who don't rely on tabs, how do you keep track of what
you're doing?
iGTD (or Linux equivalent)?
http://bargiel.home.pl/iGTD/
> And the longer you can afford to wait to purchase, the better - not
> just true with Apple products. Any electronic product is likely to
> see new & improved versions or price cuts over time.
I think though the general optimization strategy is to buy very soon
after an update/refresh, as that will give you the longest time before
the next update/refresh.
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|