|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
[PLUG] Using 'noatime' in fstab?
|
I read someplace that you can reduce wear and tear on hard drives by
including noatime in the mount options. I already do this for the one
system I have using a CF card, but I was wondering about it just in general.
I have several servers that rsync themselves various places for backups.
That means that every time I rsync the entire filesystem, a gazillion
atimes are being updated for essentially no reason. Ditto for the
s/locate indexer. I can't recall ever using an atime for anything
(ctime and mtime yes, atime no).
Can anyone give me a good reason not to do this on some/all of my
machines? All of my machines are ext3, some have H/W EIDE RAID, others
have software (MDM) mirroring, some are just plain old hard drives, if
it matters. Most are Debian or Ubuntu but I have a couple of CentOS4
boxes too. And what about for machines in a VM?
Thanks,
JP
----------------------------|:::======|-------------------------------
JP Vossen, CISSP |:::======| jp{at}jpsdomain{dot}org
My Account, My Opinions |=========| http://www.jpsdomain.org/
----------------------------|=========|-------------------------------
"Microsoft Tax" = the additional hardware & yearly fees for the add-on
software required to protect Windows from its own poorly designed and
implemented self, while the overhead incidentally flattens Moore's Law.
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|