|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] going vmware reply
|
On Jul 31, 2008, at 11:10 AM, jeff wrote:
>
>
>
>> the vendor/vendor apps to run on vmware are a major impediment.
>
> Not at all.
> The vendors claim the program won't work virtualized and they won't
> support it. So you forget to mention it when you call for support.
>
> So far, most of our vendors have said they won't support it (but
> that it
> has been done). One told us that everybody that virtualized their app
> wound up going back to physical (yeah, right).
NO - Its more basic than that...
If they sell appliances themselves - WHY would they ever allow a
VMWare version?>
i know they should but for some they make more money selling this.
For example - how many asterisk systems are sold as hardware... ?
Tons
Shame - and they perhaps should be flogged for doing such things...
but alas i should get off my soapbox ;-)
>
>
>
>
>> many vendors have not tested their virtual on a vm, and
>> consequently wont
>> bless it.
>> i dont understand this.
>> i would want to be the 1st on the block to have my app work in a vm.
>> but thats the reality.
>
>
There are some that are like this -
Still Secure Software is one...
there are others as well.
Has anyone here played with Enomalism yet?
Looks Decent
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|