|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] FAT conflicts?
|
Didn't the older non-MS DOS's like Dr. DOS use fat?
Seems like one could not suddenly decide that something is patented that has
been in the public domain for 25 years.
bs
Quoting edmond rodriguez <erodrig_97@yahoo.com>:
> A friend just sent this to me, though it might be of interest.
>
>
> Microsoft suit over FAT patents could open OSS Pandora's Box
> http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/02/microsoft-sues-tomtom-over-fat-
patents-in-linux-based-device.ars
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|