Re: [PLUG] FAT conflicts?

[Edmond Rodriguez <erodrig_97@yahoo.com>]

A friend just sent this to me, my older mail being below.  This is the only site I looked at about this so far.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/microsoft-and-tomtom-settle-linux-patent-suit-linux-not-necessa/


Earlier mail:
Also, (I was curious to know more) here is a link I searched that shows the lawsuits in pdf (about 1/2 page down).  

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10172068-56.html


First mail:
----- Original Message ----
> From: edmond rodriguez <erodrig_97@yahoo.com>
> To: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 6:33:26 PM
> Subject: FAT conflicts?
> 
> A friend just sent this to me, though it might be of interest. 
> 
> 
> Microsoft suit over FAT patents could open OSS Pandora's Box
> http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/02/microsoft-sues-tomtom-over-fat-patents-in-linux-based-device.ars

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug