|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Testing the waters w/IPv6
|
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ed Ackerman wrote:
> OK, I'll admit it, the hype about the imminent demise of available v4
> address space has me investigating v6. Besides it seems like a something
> fun to do, sort of like the first time you were able to get news through
> a uucp connection. If anyone goes back that far.
>
> I have a working tunnel (6to4) running and I'm about to shift the
> endpoint to my WAP from test (CentOS 5.4), and get a subnet. I'm using
> sixxs as my broker.
>
> Is there a group consensus about which is subjectively better, openwrt
> or dd-wrt? The hardware will support either.
In my experience, dd-wrt is easier if you're sticking to defaults. openwrt
is better if you're fiddling.
IPv6 generally counts as "fiddling."
Lately I just use openwrt everywhere. It's been pretty stable and easy
enough!
IPv6 rules. Join me in the future!
(But I'm lame and just use miredo everywhere, since it's so easy!)
-- Asheesh.
--
Must I hold a candle to my shames?
-- William Shakespeare, "The Merchant of Venice"
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|