| Bob Schwier on 10 Mar 2011 06:34:09 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [PLUG] [OT] waiting for a socket/event vs. waiting for a socket/event |
----- Original Message -----
From:Walt Mankowski <waltman@pobox.com>
To:plug@lists.phillylinux.org
Cc:
Sent:Monday, March 7, 2011 10:28 PM
Subject:Re: [PLUG] [OT] waiting for a socket/event vs. waiting for a socket/event
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:57:18PM -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> One of my pet peeves about colloquial American English is the use of
> "waiting on" when what is meant is "waiting for" - as in "I'll be waiting on
> you downstairs" to which I am often tempted to reply "Thank you, but I don't
> intend to dine downstairs."
I believe that use of "waiting on" is regional American English. As a
native Philadelphian, I never use "wait on" in that sense. As another
example, I wait in line to get tickets, while New Yorkers wait *on*
line.
> Does a process wait for a socket/event or does a process wait on a
> socket/event?
Wait for.
Walt
Waitresses wait on tables. Think of it as an older use of the word.
bs
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug