Re: [PLUG] NetBSD Talk

[gary@duzan.org]

   Ok, I guess that's enough. How's the West calendar look?

                                  Gary Duzan


=> I haven't touched netbsd in years. I would love to see what has changed.
=>
=> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 19:37 Jonathan Simpson <jonathan@jdsnetwork.com>
=> wrote:
=>
=>> Count me in.
=>> On Aug 19, 2015 7:27 PM, "Bill East" <wm.east@gmail.com> wrote:
=>>
=>>> I ran [mumble]BSD as a server some years ago, since then I've
=>>> encountered
=>>> it from time to time in appliance form (e.g., CoyotePoint's load
=>>> balancers
=>>> all ran NetBSD under the hood). I'd love to get some better information
=>>> about it so sign me up - If I can actually make it to a meeting again.
=>>>
=>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:58 AM, JP Vossen <jp@jpsdomain.org> wrote:
=>>>
=>>>> On 08/18/2015 11:10 AM, gary@duzan.org wrote:
=>>>> >    At West last night I was invited to give a talk on NetBSD. I
=>>>> could
=>>>> > probably put something together, but I wanted to gauge the level of
=>>>> > interest, so let me know if you would be interested in such a talk.
=>>>>
=>>>> +1 on the talk (North or West for me :).
=>>>>
=>>>> I can't recommend _Absolute FreeBSD_ highly enough, awesome book.
=>>>> Same
=>>>> guy also has _Absolute OpenBSD_ but nothing for NetBSD.
=>>>>
=>>>> A quick reminder on the different *BSDs might be good too.  As I
=>>>> recall:
=>>>>         OpenBSD is the most "closed" and secure
=>>>>         NetBSD is the one that runs on ANYTHING *and* EVERYTHING
=>>>>         FreeBSD is the one that everyone steals and re-uses
=>>>>
=>>>> Comments/corrections?
=>>>>
=>>>> Later,
=>>>> JP
=>>>> ----------------------------|:::======|-------------------------------
=>>>> JP Vossen, CISSP            |:::======|      http://bashcookbook.com/
=>>>> My Account, My Opinions     |=========|      http://www.jpsdomain.org/
=>>>> ----------------------------|=========|-------------------------------
=>>>> "Microsoft Tax" = the additional hardware & yearly fees for the add-on
=>>>> software required to protect Windows from its own poorly designed and
=>>>> implemented self, while the overhead incidentally flattens Moore's
=>>>> Law.
=>>>>
=>>>>
___________________________________________________________________________
=>>>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
=>>>> http://www.phillylinux.org
=>>>> Announcements -
=>>>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
=>>>> General Discussion  --
=>>>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
=>>>>
=>>>
=>>>
=>>>
=>>>
___________________________________________________________________________
=>>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
=>>> http://www.phillylinux.org
=>>> Announcements -
=>>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
=>>> General Discussion  --
=>>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
=>>>
=>>>
=>>
___________________________________________________________________________
=>> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
=>> http://www.phillylinux.org
=>> Announcements -
=>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
=>> General Discussion  --
=>> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
=>>
=>
___________________________________________________________________________
=> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
=> http://www.phillylinux.org
=> Announcements -
=> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
=> General Discussion  --
=> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
=>


___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug