| Keith C. Perry on 26 Sep 2018 10:15:23 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [PLUG] COBOL again |
Well more specifically pets *versus* cattle...
Thanks for the reference too. I first heard it from you, so I've been giving you the credit...
...then I plug the bash book...
"Wait, what's bash?"
"It's a Linux shell"
"OH, yea, I've heard of Linux"
"Great! If you want
to learn more about
working with Linux,
the Bash Cookbook is
a good reference to
have"
(see, there's a method :D )
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Keith C. Perry, MS E.E.
Managing Member, DAO Technologies LLC
(O) +1.215.525.4165 x2033
(M) +1.215.432.5167
www.daotechnologies.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "JP Vossen" <jp@jpsdomain.org>
To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 1:04:20 PM
Subject: Re: [PLUG] COBOL again
"Cattle, not pets" wasn't me, I just like it.
https://devops.stackexchange.com/questions/653/what-is-the-definition-of-cattle-not-pets
On 09/26/2018 12:55 PM, Keith C. Perry wrote:
> Not so random JP... I brought up Walt's point about 2 million **new** lines of COBOL code a year at a conference I gave a talk at last week.
>
> There were some former COBOL folks in the room that smiled.
>
> I also used your "pets and cattle" analogy elsewhere in cloud conversations- that one was very well received :D
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> Keith C. Perry, MS E.E.
> Managing Member, DAO Technologies LLC
> (O) +1.215.525.4165 x2033
> (M) +1.215.432.5167
> www.daotechnologies.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JP Vossen" <jp@jpsdomain.org>
> To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 5:09:52 PM
> Subject: [PLUG] COBOL again
>
> We've talked about this a few times, especially after one of Walt's
> COBOL talks:
> https://developers.slashdot.org/story/18/09/25/1759250/do-you-know-cobol-if-so-there-might-be-a-job-for-you
>
> I just started wondering about this though, just because the language is
> Cobol doesn't mean modern techniques can't be used. Can you do this
> remote? Is the code in Git? Can there be unit tests, CI, and all of
> that good stuff? COBOL linters?
>
> Wow:
> * https://github.com/tollofsen/linter-cobc
> * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis
>
> What Cobol is even used? The Mint repos have "Open COBOL" but that
> "translates COBOL into C and compiles the translated code using GCC"
> which feels like cheating. Presumably production is IBM COBOL or
> related, so I wonder how close the two are. I'm gonna go out on a limb
> and say that a Linux test/dev system would be a tad cheaper than a
> Z-series...
>
> Huh, it doesn't seem like there are a lot of options:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compilers#COBOL_compilers
>
> There are lots of books on Amazon (including, seriously, _COBOL for
> Dummies_) but many seem out of print or insanely expensive (or both).
>
> Has anyone done this or checked the job boards for COBOL?
Later,
JP
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------
JP Vossen, CISSP | http://www.jpsdomain.org/ | http://bashcookbook.com/
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug