[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Two-replies problem and Reply-To: munging (was: Today's meeting! ... and ...)



From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli@cal.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: Two-replies problem and Reply-To: munging (was: Today's meeting! ... and ...)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:19:21 -0700

From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli@cal.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: Two-replies problem and Reply-To: munging (was: Today's meeting! ... and ...)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:05:08 -0700

From: "Rick Moen" <rick@linuxmafia.com>
Subject: Two-replies problem and Reply-To: munging (was: Today's meeting! ... and ...)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:25:01 -0700

During today's meeting, I inquired if anyone present administers a
Google Group, as I was pretty confident Google Group permits either
standards-compliant operation or "munging".  People seemed to doubt this.
I just now looked it up, though, and I'm _correct_.  To set
standards-compliant operation (no "munging"; leave subscribers' headers
alone), if one is Manager of a Google Group:"

1. Open the Group.
2. Click Settings, choose "Group Settings".
3. In section Settings, choose "Email Options".
4. In field "Post Replies" choose "to the author of the message only"
 on dropdown menu.
5. Save.

In other words, BerkeleyLUG's mailing list at Google Groups doesn't
_need_ to do "munging".  Someone in charge has made it do that.
(One of the many reasons I love the mutt mailer is that it can be easily
configured to ignore "munging", so mutt users can avoid being hurt by
it.)

Hmmm... it offers several options:
Post replies to
Send replies to group posts to:
All group members
Group managers only
Group owners only
The author of the message only
Sender chooses recipient
A custom address

Well, let's see how "The author of the message only" behaves ...
there, set.
"Sender chooses recipient" sounds also like it may be viable ...
but dear knows if Google Groups does that one reasonably ... or not.

Well ... that looks at least semi-reasonable.
Looking over the relevant headers, I see:
Sender: berkeleylug@googlegroups.com
From: Michael Paoli <Michael.Paoli@cal.berkeley.edu>
Reply-to: michael.paoli@cal.berkeley.edu
To: BerkeleyLUG <berkeleylug@googlegroups.com>
List-ID: <berkeleylug.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <https://groups.google.com/group/berkeleylug/post>, <mailto:berkeleylug@googlegroups.com>

So ... that should mostly be reasonable-ish.  It still shouldn't
add/munge Reply-to - I didn't set that, so it overrode/added it - it
at least ideally shouldn't add or change that.
And with the To: and List-Post: a reply-all or reply-to-list should
reasonably well cover posting to the list ... though it annoys me that
they also give https in List-Post and also give that first - many older
clients don't handle that well (trying to send email to
https://groups.google.com/group/berkeleylug/post
doesn't work very well).

Anyway, should at least be an improvement and work better now, at least
in general.


... and trying:
Sender chooses recipient
because I found two different clients didn't offer a
reply-all or reply-to-list type of option when it was set to:
The author of the message only
even though from a quick inspection of the headers, it would seem
they ought to and would offer such option(s).

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BerkeleyLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to berkeleylug+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/berkeleylug/20210620233620.10007hjeso1j3hoo%40webmail.rawbw.com.