[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: A Philly Lambda Project
|
- From: "Andrew Gwozdziewycz" <apgwoz@gmail.com>
- To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: A Philly Lambda Project
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:15:41 -0400
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of apgwoz@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=apgwoz@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to:received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received:dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe; bh=PoIz+FiUIzObBtcPr/FQBpxVeRX/CKMpWr8qqwKvF54=; b=pxEmBX98DgJkhTH3gqbrE0twNgPcHABA9r8Jrp66CCBy2dnMhFVaIYzaOciHrRScgoLbLOANzRurwVY+sCCqbSBu6FIqyTkXhAhlZ5DCxEds3MP0IZfETRQCW3HhMHfBaFrvEkLTGqqN8V/m68oXbteR2+qjA+h1f0IRBpuFPQk=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=D5Us2y9yHqZIyi32m1oEj6zlmTfwfkvER/gHtF45RUQ=; b=HlCRYO3CI+X+C2EQ4RcYCMDQbn7gu9za9BE+cMawtJgi2Nobha+YvYe6ulbL+HSpOj+N2YHFkAsiKiAsH/iaij8kmlcxUnL/U2lbaIpNlC405XwoOq13dFwnbiLiqdnMdCJoM5Va2uPx+paF5n+HGAaErD/Z/aBTOj3Q3xhKum8=
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda-owner@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think one of the criteria should be that it's simple enough that we
> can have a working prototype in a weekend so that people can start
> playing with something. i.e. instant gratification. Plus, others
> could re-write it as an exercise in fp if they desired. More features
> could always be added later.
>
> Just to throw a few other ideas out there that might be conducive to
> functional programming...
> - A Map/Reduce library (or some other distributed computing framework)
> - A web server
> - A Lisp interpreter (or any interpreter for that matter)
> - A feed aggregator
While I like the idea of something that can have a prototype in a weekend,
the ideas presented here are less interesting only because they've been
done to death. Aside from maybe the map/reduce thing.
Creating something which is useful in day to day life is a better idea, because
it shows that functional programming can be used to create actual things that
people use. It's evangelical. So, the real question is perhaps, "Does anyone
have a big project they want to do but don't have a ton of time to work on by
themselves, and wouldn't mind sharing the load with other people?" Or, maybe
that's not the real question.
--
Andrew Gwozdziewycz
apgwoz@gmail.com
http://www.apgwoz.com | http://www.photub.com
|
|