[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: "Aaron Feng" <aaron.feng@gmail.com>
- To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: Arc misunderstood
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:51:01 -0500
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of aaron.feng@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=aaron.feng@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to :sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=BfLY9ytOEypgn2+KPjZQIT4up39CF5I71hEcPP95k6I=; b=225+4AToiaF1XDIqTV4DLnZaCgzsXhtjxgxMeJOo+6C3Q4I+l6oH8zVhoL+jxQ7yLr 6V1tHjmqXet35erSjVh+NgJLOPh48JDdRIe1sHXkfqYVi7HwWmucl4gGFNxmX4fBZo0M jwZLH6EI09vD67tBchRwe59juRbFCvZpIYquI=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=NUrPNEt4eXvUFmRBVp12PoqMiB55ZF+xeNXAQ97K0ks=; b=KKlJjXNhzMw3Ta/L7+tf2g7XBMteWiPXN3hQ6rHoes77FllJtyEoKoVha5mw4ACYkQ RcWMgn2LCa2iuzfhT27MQVc1STOpyPeFDa5Ij4Y7WyNyG6kmBcHbGeFTWzC9EZw9wcr4 P71FhI4glTOpQrl5UURdXg4fqhjd8Q/XRpr1A=
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda+owner@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
It seems like pg cares more about "seeding" the community with arc at
the moment. Maybe the next version is coming 50 years from now!
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not to take any steam away from Mike's presentation on Clojure (which
> was great, by the way), but we started talking about Arc afterwards
> and I found this post on the Arc language forum where the community
> expresses its frustrations with Paul Graham not iterating Arc fast
> enough.
>
> http://arclanguage.org/item?id=8462
>
> PG's response is especially interesting. There is also some
> comparison to Clojure.
>
|
|