|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Very cool. No Haskell?
Aaron
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Dan Mead <d.w.mead@gmail.com> wrote:
> woops, wrong link
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/stubert311?feature=mhw4
>
> On Feb 8, 10:46 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Found this on Reddit today. Don't read if you aren't ready to
>> cheat :)
>>
>> http://www.solussd.com/2009/11/a-clojure-highlife/
>>
>> On Feb 7, 11:48 pm, Aaron Feng <aaron.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>>> 1. Is laziness breaking your call do take? Do you need to wrap
>>>> it in
>>>> a doall?
>>
>>> I don't think that's the problem, I tried doall. It didn't make any
>>> difference. The output seems to be different when I do
>>> (take 5 (iterate run board)) vs (run (run (run (run board))))
>>
>>>> 2. After I slept on it, I came to prefer the agent approach to the
>>>> iterate. The iterate is good for prototyping, but the agent will
>>>> be
>>>> better for production because of this exact list issue you're
>>>> seeing.
>>
>>> True, I'll eventually make an agent version too.
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>
>>> Aaron
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to philly-lambda
> +unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words
> "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to philly-lambda+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
|
|