|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
I'm learning the imaging library called opencv for a project and the
usual API is called from C
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Aaron Feng <aaron.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very cool. No Haskell?
>
> Aaron
>
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Dan Mead <d.w.mead@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> woops, wrong link
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/user/stubert311?feature=mhw4
>>
>> On Feb 8, 10:46 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Found this on Reddit today. Don't read if you aren't ready to
>>> cheat :)
>>>
>>> http://www.solussd.com/2009/11/a-clojure-highlife/
>>>
>>> On Feb 7, 11:48 pm, Aaron Feng <aaron.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sean,
>>>
>>>>> 1. Is laziness breaking your call do take? Do you need to wrap
>>>>> it in
>>>>> a doall?
>>>
>>>> I don't think that's the problem, I tried doall. It didn't make any
>>>> difference. The output seems to be different when I do
>>>> (take 5 (iterate run board)) vs (run (run (run (run board))))
>>>
>>>>> 2. After I slept on it, I came to prefer the agent approach to the
>>>>> iterate. The iterate is good for prototyping, but the agent will
>>>>> be
>>>>> better for production because of this exact list issue you're
>>>>> seeing.
>>>
>>>> True, I'll eventually make an agent version too.
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>> Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to philly-lambda
>> +unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words
>> "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to philly-lambda+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to philly-lambda+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
|
|