Re: [PhillyOnRails] Center City Meeting @ Comcast

[Flinn Mueller <theflinnster@gmail.com>]

Ok, I'll speak up for the travelers.  I have spoken to some other  
people at meetings who like me drive a long distance to FW.  Some  
from Lancaster, Reading (yeah not that far), or like me all the way  
in Wilkes-Barre (2hrs call me crazy).  So for us northern travelers  
I'd suggest that pub night is less appealing than FW.

Also I'll be the first to mention that having a meeting at the pub/ 
bar might be less desirable for some of us coffee only drinkers.

That said I'm Ok with alternating if needed, but I would suggest  
actually having the first pub night to check attendance and find out  
what the overlap between FW and CC visitors before making any plans  
to alternate.

It might mean that I and some others will only make it to FW/burbs,  
but it also means that some CC people will finally get to participate.

--flinn

On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Aaron Blohowiak wrote:

> Compromise does not have to mean 50-50.
>
> I don't think the suburbanites that refuse to come into the city  
> are pub goers.
>
> To acknowledge and respect the phillyonrails founders and the  
> northern suburbanites, we should have meetings in ft. washington at  
> least alternating monthly.
>
> I think pubnites in cc, and meetings alternating between downtown  
> and ft. washington. As has been mentioned, the locale for meetings  
> in ft. washington has now become an issue.

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@phillyonrails.org
http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk