|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PhillyOnRails] Rails 2.0.x
|
- From: "Eric Snyder" <snyderep@gmail.com>
- To: talk@phillyonrails.org
- Subject: Re: [PhillyOnRails] Rails 2.0.x
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:22:31 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JqAIn5VdLhIlMxDR7cnV9yiOCmgglCMyu7EC0w6Vg4U=; b=LvpbEArZSzqe2mbZen1jhYeJ46X4zBSiunCND4OLI8bIvk6a7OfDptmvA9kj7gWt4djBY/8DtPRDi8oEzcGJVU+CJwD8WiuwoZ8Pe0l977kEN/S0bgw3dChWJ4bIXGPUOiblteRTWDgRGD7i1zp1rgMLtr838fOd4h27YkwHROw=
- List-archive: <http://lists.phillyonrails.org/pipermail/talk>
- Reply-to: talk@phillyonrails.org
- Sender: talk-bounces@phillyonrails.org
Cookie based sessions are limited to the amount of data they can
store. If you must you can easily change the session store to file
based (PStore) or ActiveRecord or another type.
On Dec 21, 2007 1:19 PM, Jonathan Van Schoick <jvanschoick@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Cliff -
>
> By "won't work so well", do you mean in terms of performance? Or in terms of
> breaking?
>
> I have an app where there's a six-page multi-part form...it's got tons of
> little form fields that junk up the session. It needs to get re-factored,
> but I'm not sure when I'll get around to it. This might force my hand...
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
>
> On Dec 21, 2007 12:54 PM, Cliff Moon <cliff@moonpolysoft.com> wrote:
> > Watch out for the XSS form token validation when upgrading. Shouldn't
> > show up if you're using rails form helpers, but otherwise it will bite.
> > Also, if you're tossing any huge stuff in the session then the default
> > cookie store won't work so well.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> > >
> > > On Dec 21, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Donald Blejwas wrote:
> > >
> > >> Is this ready for prime time? Any major known issues or concerns?
> > >
> > > Definitely ready, no doubt.
> > >
> > > The only thing I'd watch out for is dependencies on outside plugins.
> > > If they're well-maintained, they'll probably work fine. But if updates
> > > to them have languished, they might not be Rails 2.0 compatible.
> > > Happened to me, although bringing it up to par was quick and easy.
> > >
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> > > Colin A. Bartlett
> > > Kinetic Web Solutions
> > > http://blog.kineticweb.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> > > http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> > http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
|
|