Dave Turner on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:08:51 -0500 |
To continue in the vein of the discussion of the last meeting: <novalis> Right, and which is more standard, in computing generally? <Gabriel> novalis: bits. <novalis> Lines are done that way, but not connections (i.e. your download speed meter in Netscape) <Gabriel> novalis: in general refers to all fields, not just end users. Hence, bits. <novalis> Ok, how many bits is your HD? <novalis> Your ram? <novalis> a floppy? <Peregrine> How many bytes is your HD or Ram? <Peregrine> Quick grab your calculator. I'm willing to debate (on the bytes side, of course) on this.... Anyone up for it? Mark, some variant of this would make a decent advocacy round. John Kirk wrote: <SNIP> > On the other hand, if we're GUI'd out but can stand this John Kirk guy, I > could talk about some work I've done extending PDL to handle a more general > format of 3D modelling data structure than it has built-in currently. If > you have PDL installed, look at the 3D demos available when you run the > perldl shell. The one that shows a "barrel" shape demonstrates using a 2D > array of 3D points to define a topologically toroidal surface. I was so > impressed with the performance of PDL for this kind of thing that I wanted > to experiment with perl for more general 3D modelling. > > Both of the upcoming empty dates would be OK by me, for either or both > topics. > **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** > **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org** -- -Dave Turner Stalk me: (215)-545-2859 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "It is said that it is the curse of the neophobe to always see the symptoms as the disease, and to always make half measures" - Pug **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|