Jack Wilkinson on Mon, 12 Jul 1999 09:23:04 -0400 (EDT) |
That's how NT is designed, bud. One server per daemon. A company who wants to establish a major internet presence using NT needs one server for each of the following, typically: - Web Server - Mail Server - DNS - Gateway Plus servers for ftp, news, etc. if needed, but only one daemon per box. Backoffice and all that comes out to a pretty penny in the pocket of MS. It's a matter of marketing genius, not necessarily a badly-made OS (well, meaning an OS made badly unintentionally). >I'm an NT Admin at a local engineering shop. We are all NT in the backend >and a mix of NT and 95 on the client side. The best fix we have found for >NT problems is to reload. The solution for making MS crap work in the >backend is to load only one server app per server. MS apps can barely run >with the OS, let alone running multiple apps on one box. I love loading a >new SP in the middle of the day and having to reboot our main server. MS >needs to stick to the client side and let the big boys write the server >OS's. >MS SUCKS! >Mark -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- M. Jackson Wilkinson <jackw@jounce.net> President-JounceNET Internet Services Debian: The choice of a GNU Generation _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|