Ayares, Mark on Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:18:23 -0400 (EDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [Plug] Ya know, it's a shame..


Who cares about Windoz!

-----Original Message-----
From: Vettese, Nick A [mailto:NAVETTESE@delinvest.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 3:17 PM
To: 'plug@lists.nothinbut.net'
Subject: RE: [Plug] Ya know, it's a shame..


Is this the origanal letter???

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Stack [mailto:charles@codycomp.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 2:04 PM
To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
Subject: Re: [Plug] Ya know, it's a shame..


Alas...the problem with Windows...available GDI and User resources.  What's
worse, is that even if you close those programs that are sucking up your
resources, that your system may or may not recover.  Problem's been around
even in Windows 3.1 days.  Win98 has twice as many resource handles as
95...NT supposely isn't constrained by this problem.  But, on Win95 and
Win98 (I'm a...ummm....Windows developer)...I'm constantly watching my
resources.  Which brings me to another point...watch the resource monitor
you use.  Some are literal black holes for resources.

What color resolution are you running your system in?  Going to "True Color"
sucks up resources at an alarming rate.

Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Ban <aban@voicenet.com>
To: 'plug@lists.nothinbut.net' <plug@lists.nothinbut.net>
Date: Friday, July 09, 1999 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Plug] Ya know, it's a shame..


>
>DUCK everyone "it" is gonna start to fly!!
>
>I have windows 98 running on a box with 256MB of memory (don't ask why it
>just happend) but to make a long story short when I boot 98 it uses 70% to
>80% on boot up alone - if I open outlook, free agent and netscape it runs
>out of resources - problem I think so!!
>
>my $00.02
>
>Drew
>
>On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Vettese, Nick A wrote:
>
>> I know you are all going to hate me but I have to say this:
>>
>> What are you doing that you can't keep Windows running.  Windows isn't
that
>> bad.  I am running NT4, 95, 98, and 4 Linux boxes, and the only time I
have
>> to reboot Windows is when I load configure or something.  You make
Windows
>> seem like it has no legs to walk on.  I love Linux, and I am doing a hell
of
>> a lot of studying to learn more, but if Windows is so bad why does 3/4ths
of
>> the world use it.  There are many options today, so it can't be the
reason
>> it is the only one out there.  You have Linux, Unix (all versions), BeOs,
>> 95, 98, NT, Mac, OS/2, and others.  There are many office programs,
business
>> program, and anything else that might be needed that runs on other OSs.
If
>> all of you are having that many problems then you better leave computers
to
>> the more capable.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ray beckler [mailto:rbeckler@erols.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 1:37 PM
>> To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
>> Subject: Re: [Plug] Ya know, it's a shame..
>>
>>
>> Vale_Kenny@vanguard.com wrote:
>>
>> > I use my Linux system about 20-25 hours a week, and I use my NT system
>> about 3-4
>> > hours a week.  Of that time less than 1% of the time on the Linux box
is
>> spent
>> > in reboots, and 10% in reboots of the NT box.  Because NT is such a
>> complete
>> > *HOG*, I have to run it on a Pentium II system with a sh1tload of RAM
and
>> disk
>> > space.  My Linux system is running on a Pentium 90 system, with half
the
>> RAM,
>> > and slower drives.  I mean, yeah, it still runs as fast as the NT
system,
>> but I
>> > can only imagine it on the Pentium II.  But I have to keep the damn NT,
to
>> use
>> > it for testing.  Pisses me off.
>> >
>> > Just a small rant..
>>
>> I run win95, linux and SCO opensever on a pentium 166.  NEVER have to
reboot
>> Linux
>> or SCO but have daily visits from the blue/black screen of death on win.
>> Same
>> thing, I have to keep sindows just for certain applications.  Yep, pisses
me
>> off
>> too.  Can't be happy all the time.
>>
>> ray
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
>> http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
>> http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
>http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
>


_______________________________________________
Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug

_______________________________________________
Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug

_______________________________________________
Plug maillist  -  Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug