|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [Plug] Trouble starting X remotely
|
Interesting... You mena like a portable "dumb terminal" ? I guess if it
had a cellular/satelite modem, that would be pretty cool. The actual
machine probably wouldn't be too expensive. Would probably be even
cheaper than a 386 laptop. Somehow you would have to get it Internet
access, but it wouldn't need to be VERY fast, since its only relaying
text. Thats an interesting idea. I like it! (I could telnet into my box
from anywhere I was and check my email... whoo!)
Daniel W. Ottey
Sophomore Computer Science Student
Drexel University - Philadelphia, PA
http://www.snarfykat.org/
AOL Instant Messenger: Snarf2002 - http://www.aim.aol.com/
ICQ: 5723666 - http://www.mirabilis.com/
IRC: ThundrKat - http://www.undernet.org/
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Nick R wrote:
> You know what I've always thought somebody should make (and by always, I
> mean for the past few months or less)? I think it would be cool to have a
> little portable telnet client. Just something simple w/ a fairly small
> screen that could do telnet logins. It would be better than a PDA. The
> problem is that the connection could be expensive and the density of people
> who would have Unix boxes to connect to would only be great enough in
> Silicon Valley, but it's a cool idea I think.
>
>
> >From: Joshua Mazess <mazessj@op.net>
> >Reply-To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> >To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> >Subject: Re: [Plug] Trouble starting X remotely
> >Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 08:32:41 -0400
> >
> >Most telnet clients display text only, no graphics. They are too "thin" to
> >do
> >anything more complicated than that. Some do ReGIS, but I doubt that can
> >handle
> >high resolution and many colors. You need an X server for any system that
> >you
> >want to act as an I/O terminal. So, you would need an X server for Win95
> >and
> >then you could run your X clients from Linux and direct I/O to the Win95
> >box by
> >setting the DISPLAY environment variable (or by specifying on the command
> >line
> >of the X client). --Josh
> >
> >Michael Leone wrote:
> >
> > > I have a machine running Slackware 3.4 (kernel 2.0.34) as an intranet
> >web
> > > server, email server, etc, on my LAN - all the good stuff that Linux
> >does
> > > so well and silently. :-)
> > >
> > > Anyway - I have X installed on this server. If I startx from the server
> > > console, everything comes up just as it should. Life is good.
> > >
> > > If I telnet in (from a Win95 station), and (following the example in _A
> > > Practical Guide to Linux_, the only book I have handy here at work) do a
> > > echo $DISPLAY (to get the contents of the DISPLAY environmental variable
> >to
> > > pass to X), I get a blank - not the ":0.0" example in the book.
> > >
> > > So, when I startx from the telnet session, X starts over on the server
> > > console.
> > > And I have to go over to the server and stop X. Life is bad.
> > >
> > > 1. What am I doing wrong? I want the X to show in my telnet window on my
> > > workstation, not on the server. How can I pass X the info to show up
> >here
> > > rather than there?
> > > 2. Does the server have to already be running X?
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > "...and if you have any questions about anything, come on up and ask
> > > me. Even if I don't know the answer, I'll make something up and you'll
> > > believe me."-Unknown
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
> http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
>
_______________________________________________
Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net
http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|