Bill Jonas on Sun, 29 Aug 1999 14:43:13 -0400 (EDT) |
Hehe... yeah... this is from the emachines web site... "The UART response for a HSP MicroModem 56K as "8250" is erroneous and will not cause any degradation in our modems performance. "A common method to test if a PC is communicating with the modem is to use the "more info" feature under Control Panel/Modems/Diagnostics. The response from the "more info" request includes Port, Interrupt, Address, UART, and Highest Speed, plus ATI1~ 7 responses from the modem. Windows 95/98 directly accesses the I/O looking for a hardware UART, and this is the source of the erroneous response. When Windows 95/98 accesses the I/O, it communicates with our ASIC (not a UART) and reports an 8250 UART. By using a virtual UART, the PC-TEL HSP solution eliminates the bottleneck a hardware UART imposes and is not limited to the 115K bit/s throughput. " Can anybody suggest a decent, inexpensive (non-win) modem that behaves itself? :) ----- Original Message ----- From: <umweber@mcs.drexel.edu> To: <plug@lists.nothinbut.net> Sent: Sunday, August 29, 1999 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [Plug] Linux compatible ISPs > Those HSP micromodems don't even have true 16550 UARTS! > > -- > Michelle Weber > umweber@mcs.drexel.edu > > > On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Kurt Telep wrote: > > > Bill- > > > > Yes Bill, you are correct, The modem in this box is a winmodem, and will not be > > compatible with Linux. > > It's a HSP Micromodem which is standard in ALL emachines. > > > > Kurt Telep > > > > Voicenet Linux Config (Just Updated) > > http://www.voicenet.com/~mweber/linux/new/ > > > > Free Webmail (In HEAVY Development) > > http://www.u4ea.org/~gurft/POPout.html _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|