Jason S. on Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:36:41 -0400 (EDT) |
Oh. I didnt realize they blocked it outgoing too. You'd have to setup a proxy regardless. Both sides need to speak ssl. J. When I grow up, I wanna be more like me. I had a clue. I didn't like it. I took it back and exchanged it for an attitude. On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 umweber@mcs.drexel.edu wrote: > I don't want to allow access in, I want to get out! Not for any type of > illegal purposes, I was just trying to use this client which goes along > with Scour.net's search engine which searches window's shares that's all. > What would be easier, setting it up over SSL, or setting up a proxy > through a friend who has comcast@home, which the ports are NOT blocked? > And does anyone have some good info they cam point towards to set either > up? > > Thanks, > > -- > Michelle Weber > umweber@mcs.drexel.edu > > > On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Jason S. wrote: > > > To clarify. They're blocking the SMB ports for external traffic. > > This is a good thing. The reason they're doing it is two fold. > > 1. It keeps network traffic down due to people inadvertantly > > sharing their system to the world. > > 2. Its a small measure of security for the home user. > > > > A friend was on their pilot program. People used to scan and > > try to get into systems all the time. If they _didn't_ block > > those ports, a good number of people would be in a bad position. > > Your average home user knows nothing about "file sharing" and > > whatnot. > > > > Further, if this is an issue and you want to enable SMB access to > > your system for god knows whatever reason, you should setup > > SMB over SSL. To my knowlege SSL isnt blocked. > > > > J. > > > > When I grow up, I wanna be more like me. > > I had a clue. I didn't like it. I took it back and exchanged it for an > > attitude. > > > > On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 umweber@mcs.drexel.edu wrote: > > > > > This is for the person who asked about Suburban@home cable service. > > > I have had it since july, with absolutely no problems, it's fast and > > > reliable. (Although of course I did have to put a windows box in the room > > > I wanted it to be for them to install it). But there is one huge problem, > > > Ports 137, 138, 139, and 1080 are blocked, so if you wanna set up a home > > > network with Windows involved, or use samba, I think it may be a problem. > > > I tried using scour media agent (http://www.scour.net) to get some files > > > through, this client uses perl and samba to do so, and was unable to > > > because of port 139 being blocked. (It downloads files of of Windows > > > shares).. Which is how I found out about this little "issue" > > > I get they want to discourage you from setting up a network, and would > > > rather you buy additional IPs at $9.95/mo > > > > > > -- > > > Michelle Weber > > > umweber@mcs.drexel.edu > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:06:29 -0400 > > > From: Support@Suburban.com > > > To: michelle <mbw22@home.com> > > > Subject: Port Blocking > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear @Home Subscriber, > > > > > > Yes, these ports are blocked. There is no ETA on whether these ports will > > > be made available anytime soon. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you > > > while using our service. Any other questions please feel free to contact us at > > > 1.888.398.4547 between the hours of 7:00am to 12:00pm. > > > > > > > > > Technical Support Staff > > > Support@Suburban.com > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net > > > http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net > > http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net > http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|