rscudder on Fri, 5 May 2000 10:05:58 -0400 (EDT) |
> On Thu, 4 May 2000, Tracy Nelson wrote: > > _Java in a Nutshell_ is a good reference book, but I'd hate to try to learn > > Java from it. In fact, I did hate learning Java from it, which is why I > > bought Peter van der Linden's _Just Java 2_. It's a good book if you're > > coming to Java as an experienced programmer. > Since we expressing two opposite opinions on the Nutshell book, let's make > this disagreement useful for people. What didn't you like about it? > I liked it because it was direct and to the point, and it covered the > language in a logical order. I'll it admit that it probably did help that > I was alreay familiar with C++, which they used as a point of comparison. BTW, one thing that really stuck with me, was the point the writer made that Java actually has more in common with C than C++. Most people that I have spoken with consider Java a "shoe in" for anyone good C++ skills, but not so much so for a C (only) programmer. I think that anyone who approaches learning Java with an "I know C++ so I already know most of Java" attitude is headed for trouble. BTW Mike, Please don't think I am pointing this statement at you. I know nothing of your approach toward learning Java (or anything else about you for that matter). I mean it as a general statement based on things I have read or heard people say. So far I have only done one very small part of a project in Java, so I don't know it very well. I'm hoping to get into it more later on down the road. Roger Scudder Developer\Consultant Annance Consulting Wayne, PA, USA ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|