|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Re: Dual-homed System
|
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Michael C. Toren wrote:
> I'm a little confused about your network layout, though. You have:
>
> router <-> 192.168.1.0/25 <-> linux <-> 192.168.1.128/25 <-> end user
>
> Is that correct? If so, give the router an IP address in 192.168.1.0/25
> for the ethernet link it's going to share with the linux box, have the
> linux box default route to the router's IP on that segment, and on the
> router, staticly route 192.168.1.128/25 to the linux box's IP in
> 192.168.1.0/25. That takes care of the "router being able to figure it
> out" bit.
>
> What I don't quite understand, though, is how you are going to translate
> the RFC1918 space into space allocated to you by your upstream? Is the
> router doing NAT for 192.168.1/24? Does the linux box have another IP
> address on the 192.168.1.0/25 ethernet segment which it will be
> masquerading the 192.168.1.128/25 addresses behind?
As I mentioned early in my explanations, I've replaced our real network
address with "192.168.1". We have a regular class C network. I'm just
not giving the address, given that we don't currently have a firewall in
place. :)
Michael W. Ryan, MCP, MCT | OTAKON 2000
mryan@netaxs.com | Convention of Otaku Generation
http://www.netaxs.com/~mryan/ | http://www.otakon.com/
No, I don't hear voices in my head;
I'm the one that tells the voices in your head what to say.
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|